J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Original Article

Volume 9, Number 3, March 2017, pages 200-206


The Change in Body Weight During Hospitalization Predicts Mortality in Patients With Acute Decompensated Heart Failure

Tomo Komakia, b, Shin-ichiro Miuraa, c, d, Tadaaki Arimuraa, Yuhei Shigaa, Joji Moriia, Takashi Kuwanoa, Satoshi Imaizumia, Ken Kitajimaa, Atsushi Iwataa, Natsumi Moritoa, Eiji Yahiroa, Kanta Fujimia, Akira Matsunagab, Keijiro Sakua, c

aDepartment of Cardiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
bDepartment of Laboratory Medicine, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
cDepartment of Molecular Cardiovascular Therapeutics, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
dCorresponding Author: Shin-ichiro Miura, Department of Cardiology, Fukuoka University School of Medicine, 7-45-1 Nanakuma, Jonan-ku, Fukuoka 814-0180, Japan

Manuscript accepted for publication January 10, 2017
Short title: Changes in Body Weight and Heart Failure
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr2890w

Abstract▴Top 

Background: In our experience, the change in body weight (BW) during hospitalization varies greatly in patients with acute decompensated heart failure (HF). Since the clinical significance of a change in BW is not clear, we investigated whether a change in BW could predict mortality.

Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 130 patients (72 males; aged 68 ± 10 years) who were hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF and followed for 2 years after discharge. The change in the BW index during hospitalization (ΔBWI) was calculated as (BW at hospital admission minus BW at hospital discharge)/body surface area at hospital discharge.

Results: The patients were divided into quartiles according to ΔBWI, and the 2-year mortality rates in the quartiles with the lowest, second, third and highest ΔBWI were 18.8%, 12.1%, 3.1% and 9.1%, respectively. In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis after adjusting for variables with a P value less than 0.05, ΔBWI was independently associated with 2-year mortality (P = 0.0002), and the quartile with the lowest ΔBWI had a higher relative risk (RR) for 2-year mortality than the quartile with the highest ΔBWI (RR: 7.46, 95% confidence interval: 1.03 - 53.99, P = 0.04).

Conclusion: In conclusion, ΔBWI was significantly associated with 2-year mortality after discharge, which indicates that ΔBWI might be a simple predictor of prognosis in acute decompensated HF.

Keywords: Predictor of prognosis; Change in body weight index; Acute decompensated heart failure

Introduction▴Top 

Heart failure (HF) is a clinical syndrome that occurs in patients who, because of an inherited or acquired abnormality of cardiac structure and/or function, develop a constellation of clinical symptoms (dyspnea and fatigue) and signs (edema and rales). Patients with HF are repeatedly hospitalized and experience a poor quality of life and a shortened life expectancy. Although long-term mortality rates for patients with HF are gradually improving through the application of various therapies [1-7], they are still unacceptably high [8]. In recent years, there has been an increase in the number of biomarkers in HF, such as troponin [9], estimated glomerular filtration rate [10], cystatin C [11], serum uric acid [12], and anemia [13], in addition to B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and amino acid N-terminal pro-BNP [14, 15]. The ultimate clinical role of these novel biomarkers is not clear. Since patients with HF often show fluid retention with leg edema regardless of the etiology of HF, an important goal in the acute phase of HF is fluid control by diuretics. When we treated patients with HF in clinical practice, we noted that the change in body weight (BW) during hospitalization varied greatly in patients with acute decompensated HF. We considered that the change in BW during hospitalization may be a simple predictor of the prognosis in HF. There have been no previous reports on the association between changes in BW due to treatment and the prognosis of HF. The patients with greater changes in BW may have a wide range of therapeutic responses, compared to those with smaller changes who exhibit a narrow range of responses. Therefore, we hypothesized that patients with greater changes in BW might have a better prognosis than those with smaller changes.

In this study, we investigated the associations between the change in BW during hospitalization and the prognosis in patients with acute decompensated HF.

Methods▴Top 

Study population

We retrospectively investigated the association between the change in BW during hospitalization and the prognosis of HF. We enrolled 130 consecutive patients who were initially hospitalized due to acute decompensated HF at Fukuoka University Hospital from 2001 to 2013 and followed for 2 years after discharge. The diagnosis of HF was established by the simultaneous presence of at least two major Framingham criteria or one major criterion in conjunction with two minor criteria. The primary end-point was 2-year mortality after discharge. We excluded patients with end-stage renal disease under maintenance dialysis. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of Fukuoka University Hospital (#16-1-21). We collected and analyzed all data using the database of Fukuoka University Hospital.

Clinical parameters

Data on age, gender, BW at admission and discharge, body mass index (BMI) at admission and discharge, systolic blood pressure (SBP) at admission, body surface area (SFA) at discharge calculated by the formula of DuBois, duration of hospitalization, New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class at hospitalization, the etiology of HF, the presence or absence of diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HTN), medications, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) using Simpson’s method, BNP, hemoglobin (Hb), serum sodium, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine clearance (CCr) calculated by the formula of Cockcroft-Gault, and the presence of an implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) were collected. In the measurement of BW at admission, a weighing scale was used for mobile patients with acceptable dyspnea, while a weighing and lifting scale was used in immobile patients with severe dyspnea. The change in the BW index (ΔBWI) during hospitalization was calculated as (BW at hospital admission minus BW at hospital discharge)/(SFA at hospital admission).

The cause of HF was classified as ischemic heart disease (IHD), hypertensive cardiomyopathy (HTCM), valvular heart disease, dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM), arrhythmia, or unknown. When there were multiple causes of HF, the main cause of HF was assumed based on the patient’s medical history. Patients who had a current SBP and DBP ≥ 140 and 90 mm Hg, respectively, or who were receiving antihypertensive therapy were considered to have HTN. DM was defined using the Japan Diabetes Society criteria.

Statistical analysis

All statistical analyses were performed using StatFlex V6 (Artech Co., Ltd., Osaka, Japan). Date were expressed as the mean ± standard deviation (SD) or median ± quartile deviation (QD) for continuous variables and as a percentage (%) for categorical variables. Subjects were classified into two groups according to 2-year mortality (survival and death groups) after discharge. In addition, subjects were categorized into quartiles according to ΔBWI as follows: < 1.3 kg/m2 (lowest ΔBWI), 1.3 - 2.9 kg/m2 (second ΔBWI), 3 - 4.7 kg/m2 (third ΔBWI) and ≥ 4.8 kg/m2 (highest ΔBWI). Categorical and continuous variables were compared between two groups by a Chi-square analysis and Student’s t-test, respectively. When continuous variables did not show a normal distribution, we performed a Mann-Whitney U test. Categorical and continuous variables were compared among the quartile ΔBWI groups by a Chi-square analysis and one-way analysis of variance, respectively. When continuous variables did not show a normal distribution, we performed a Kruskal-Wallis test. The univariate relationship between ΔBWI and 2-year mortality was evaluated using a Kaplan-Meier analysis. Differences in 2-year mortality across the quartiles of ΔBWI were evaluated using the log-rank test. The association between ΔBWI and 2-year mortality was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards regression. Before the multivariate analysis, the duration of hospitalization, age, CCr, BW at admission and discharge, BMI at admission and discharge, SBP at admission, BUN, serum sodium, BNP and ΔBWI were normalized by a power transformation to correct for a skewed distribution. A backward-stepwise Cox proportional hazards model was used to identify the independent predictors of mortality, retaining variables with P < 0.05. Significant factors included the etiology of HTCM, DM, CCr, SBP at admission, BNP, β-blockers, duration of hospitalization, and ΔBWI. Additional covariates were not considered to be independent predictors of mortality, including age, gender, HTN, DM, NYHA functional class, Hb, serum sodium, BUN, the etiology of IHD, valvular cardiac disease and arrhythmia, LVEF, the use of diuretics, angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI) or angiotensin II type 1 receptor blocker (ARB), digitalis, oral anticoagulants, nitrates, spironolactone and antiplatelets, BW at admission and discharge, BMI at admission and discharge, and the presence of ICD implantation. A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis was then conducted, and the above variables were combined with the categorized ΔBWI. The reference group was defined as ΔBWI ≥ 4.8 kg/m2, which was the quartile with the highest ΔBWI. P < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.

Results▴Top 

Patient characteristics in the survival and death groups

The mean age of the 130 patients was 68 ± 10 years, and 79 of them were male (60%). Fourteen patients died during the 2-year follow-up period (11%). The cause of death was progressive pump failure in 13 patients and sudden death in one and six of these patients were implanted with an ICD (42%). Table 1 shows the patient characteristics in the survival (n = 116) and death (n = 14) groups. The patients in the death group were significantly older and had lower SBP at admission, lower CCr, Hb and serum sodium, higher BNP and BUN, a longer duration of hospitalization and more frequent ICD implantation than those in the survival group.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Patient Characteristics in the Survival and Death Groups
 

Mortality rates in quartiles according to ΔBWI

The mortality rates in quartiles according to ΔBWI were 19% (n = 6), 12% (n = 4), 3% (n = 1), and 9% (n = 3) in the quartiles with the lowest, second, third and highest ΔBWI, respectively (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Mortality rates in quartiles (lowest, second, third and highest) according to ΔBWI.

Patient characteristics in quartiles according to ΔBWI

The patient characteristics in the quartiles of ΔBWI are shown in Table 2. In a comparative analysis, age, gender, NYHA functional class II and IV, LVEF, BW at admission and duration of hospitalization significantly differed among the quartiles of ΔBWI.

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Patient Characteristics in Quartiles According to ΔBWI
 

Kaplan-Meier analysis of survival in the quartiles of ΔBWI

Figure 2 shows the Kaplan-Meier curves of survival in the quartiles of ΔBWI. Patients were categorized into quartiles according to ΔBWI. In unadjusted comparisons, the third-quartile ΔBWI group had the best survival, while the quartile with the lowest ΔBWI had the worst survival. A log-rank test showed that the difference between the quartiles with the third and lowest ΔBWI was statistically significant (P = 0.045).

Figure 2.
Click for large image
Figure 2. Kaplan-Meier curves of survival in quartiles (lowest, second, third and highest) according to ΔBWI.

Cox proportional hazards analyses to identify independent predictors of mortality

In the adjusted Cox proportional hazards analyses, as shown in Table 3, a decrease in ΔBWI was found to be a statistically significant predictor of 2-year mortality, as were other variables including SBP at admission, BNP, DM, CCr, duration of hospitalization, use of β-blocker and the etiology of HTCM.

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Cox Proportional Hazards Analyses to Identify Independent Predictors of Mortality
 

A multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis combined with categorized ΔBWI

In the quartiles according to ΔBWI, the quartile with the lowest ΔBWI showed a much higher risk of 2-year mortality than the quartile with the highest ΔBWI (Table 4) (relative risk: 7.46, 95% CI: 1.03 - 53.99, P = 0.04).

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. A Multivariate Cox Proportional Hazards Analysis Combined With Categorized ΔBWI
 
Discussion▴Top 

The main finding in this study was that ΔBWI in hospitalized patients with acute decompensated HF was significantly associated with 2-year mortality after discharge independent of various covariates. The quartile with the lowest ΔBWI showed a much higher risk of 2-year mortality than that with the highest ΔBWI as assessed by a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Therefore, we should reinforce the treatment of HF to the patients with low ΔBWI, such as with additional medications, cardiac rehabilitation, Waon therapy, the introduction of supplemental oxygen therapy, and cardiac resynchronization therapy.

In this study, we first hypothesized that patients with a greater change in BW may have a better prognosis. Our findings support this hypothesis. Many previous reports have identified univariate predictors of reduced survival, including NYHA functional class, reduced LVEF [16], renal insufficiency, and comorbid factors, such as DM [17] and IHD. Predictive models that consider comorbidities and HF-related factors, such as the EFFECT model [18], the HF survival score [19], and the Seattle Heart Failure Model [20] have also been shown to be associated with the prognosis. However, these previous predictors and models have been insufficient: the former are limited in their ability to predict survival in individual patients, and the latter are complicated and are not performed in all institutions because of multiple factors, including the need for invasive tests. Since ΔBWI reflects the cardio-renal connection, it can be used in individual patients. Additionally, it can be used in all institutions because it is simple, inexpensive and easy to measure.

Longer period of hospitalization, lower SBP at admission, higher BNP, lower CCr and % β-blockers were also associated with 2-year mortality, as shown in Table 3, and these associations were consistent with previous reports [7, 8, 15, 21, 22]. Thus, the results indicated that the patients in this study did not represent any specific patient group.

This study has several limitations. First, this study was limited by its retrospective design. Although this study considered only a small number of patients, we collected data that we could follow for up to 2 years in as many patients as possible in our hospital from 2001 to 2013. The medication strategies in patients with HF, such as with respect to the use of human atrial natriuretic peptide and β-blockers, in the 1990s were much different from those used presently. Thus, the use of older data may directly influence the mortality. Second, the analysis was performed under conditions of various etiologies of HF and various medications. To confirm the clinical significance of the relationship between ΔBWI and 2-year mortality, we performed a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis. Prospective studies will be needed to clarify these limitations.

In conclusion, ΔBWI was significantly associated with 2-year mortality after discharge, which indicates that ΔBWI might be a simple predictor of prognosis in acute decompensated HF.

Conflicts of Interest

KS is a Chief Director and SM is a Director of NPO Clinical and Applied Science, Fukuoka, Japan. KS has an Endowed “Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Therapeutics” supported by MSD, Co. LTD. SM belongs to the Department of Molecular Cardiovascular Therapeutics, which is supported by MSD, Co. LTD.


References▴Top 
  1. Effect of enalapril on survival in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fractions and congestive heart failure. The SOLVD Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(5):293-302.
    doi pubmed
  2. Granger CB, McMurray JJ, Yusuf S, Held P, Michelson EL, Olofsson B, Ostergren J, et al. Effects of candesartan in patients with chronic heart failure and reduced left-ventricular systolic function intolerant to angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors: the CHARM-Alternative trial. Lancet. 2003;362(9386):772-776.
    doi
  3. Pitt B, Zannad F, Remme WJ, Cody R, Castaigne A, Perez A, Palensky J, et al. The effect of spironolactone on morbidity and mortality in patients with severe heart failure. Randomized Aldactone Evaluation Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 1999;341(10):709-717.
    doi pubmed
  4. Zannad F, McMurray JJ, Krum H, van Veldhuisen DJ, Swedberg K, Shi H, Vincent J, et al. Eplerenone in patients with systolic heart failure and mild symptoms. N Engl J Med. 2011;364(1):11-21.
    doi pubmed
  5. Bristow MR, Gilbert EM, Abraham WT, Adams KF, Fowler MB, Hershberger RE, Kubo SH, et al. Carvedilol produces dose-related improvements in left ventricular function and survival in subjects with chronic heart failure. MOCHA Investigators. Circulation. 1996;94(11):2807-2816.
    doi pubmed
  6. Uemura Y, Shibata R, Takemoto K, Uchikawa T, Koyasu M, Ishikawa S, Mitsuda T, et al. Clinical benefit of tolvaptan in patients with acute decompensated heart failure and chronic kidney disease. Heart Vessels. 2016;31(10):1643-1649.
    doi pubmed
  7. Nabeta T, Inomata T, Iida Y, Ikeda Y, Iwamoto-Ishida M, Ishii S, Naruke T, et al. Prognostic significance of beta-blocker up-titration in conjunction with cardiac resynchronization therapy in heart failure management. Heart Vessels. 2016;31(7):1109-1116.
    doi pubmed
  8. Ho KK, Pinsky JL, Kannel WB, Levy D. The epidemiology of heart failure: the Framingham Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993;22(4 Suppl A):6A-13A.
    doi
  9. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE, Jr., Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation. 2013;128(16):e240-327.
    doi
  10. Halkar M, Tang WH. Incorporating common biomarkers into the clinical management of heart failure. Curr Heart Fail Rep. 2013;10(4):450-457.
    doi pubmed
  11. Dupont M, Wu Y, Hazen SL, Tang WH. Cystatin C identifies patients with stable chronic heart failure at increased risk for adverse cardiovascular events. Circ Heart Fail. 2012;5(5):602-609.
    doi pubmed
  12. Vaduganathan M, Greene SJ, Ambrosy AP, Mentz RJ, Subacius HP, Chioncel O, Maggioni AP, et al. Relation of serum uric acid levels and outcomes among patients hospitalized for worsening heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (from the efficacy of vasopressin antagonism in heart failure outcome study with tolvaptan trial). Am J Cardiol. 2014;114(11):1713-1721.
    doi pubmed
  13. Felker GM, Allen LA, Pocock SJ, Shaw LK, McMurray JJ, Pfeffer MA, Swedberg K, et al. Red cell distribution width as a novel prognostic marker in heart failure: data from the CHARM Program and the Duke Databank. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;50(1):40-47.
    doi pubmed
  14. Januzzi JL, Jr., Camargo CA, Anwaruddin S, Baggish AL, Chen AA, Krauser DG, Tung R, et al. The N-terminal Pro-BNP investigation of dyspnea in the emergency department (PRIDE) study. Am J Cardiol. 2005;95(8):948-954.
    doi pubmed
  15. Nakada Y, Takahama H, Kanzaki H, Sugano Y, Hasegawa T, Ohara T, Amaki M, et al. The predictability of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system factors for clinical outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. Heart Vessels. 2016;31(6):925-931.
    doi pubmed
  16. Wong M, Staszewsky L, Latini R, Barlera S, Glazer R, Aknay N, Hester A, et al. Severity of left ventricular remodeling defines outcomes and response to therapy in heart failure: Valsartan heart failure trial (Val-HeFT) echocardiographic data. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(11):2022-2027.
    doi pubmed
  17. Dries DL, Sweitzer NK, Drazner MH, Stevenson LW, Gersh BJ. Prognostic impact of diabetes mellitus in patients with heart failure according to the etiology of left ventricular systolic dysfunction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(2):421-428.
    doi
  18. Lee DS, Austin PC, Rouleau JL, Liu PP, Naimark D, Tu JV. Predicting mortality among patients hospitalized for heart failure: derivation and validation of a clinical model. JAMA. 2003;290(19):2581-2587.
    doi pubmed
  19. Aaronson KD, Schwartz JS, Chen TM, Wong KL, Goin JE, Mancini DM. Development and prospective validation of a clinical index to predict survival in ambulatory patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation. Circulation. 1997;95(12):2660-2667.
    doi pubmed
  20. Levy WC, Mozaffarian D, Linker DT, Sutradhar SC, Anker SD, Cropp AB, Anand I, et al. The Seattle Heart Failure Model: prediction of survival in heart failure. Circulation. 2006;113(11):1424-1433.
    doi pubmed
  21. Smith GL, Lichtman JH, Bracken MB, Shlipak MG, Phillips CO, DiCapua P, Krumholz HM. Renal impairment and outcomes in heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(10):1987-1996.
    doi pubmed
  22. Gheorghiade M, Abraham WT, Albert NM, Greenberg BH, O'Connor CM, She L, Stough WG, et al. Systolic blood pressure at admission, clinical characteristics, and outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. JAMA. 2006;296(18):2217-2226.
    doi pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.