Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Case Report

Volume 7, Number 7, July 2015, pages 560-563

Retreatment of a Maxillary Lateral Incisor With Two Separate Root Canals Confirmed With Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1. Preoperative periapical radiography.
Figure 2.
Figure 2. Working length determination.
Figure 3.
Figure 3. Postoperative periapical radiography.
Figure 4.
Figure 4. Periapical radiography after 18 months follow-up.
Figure 5.
Figure 5. Clinical view after 18 months follow-up.
Figure 6.
Figure 6. Axial, panoramic and cross-sectional reconstruction with a slice thickness at 1 mm.

Table

Table 1. United States Public Health Service (USPHS) Criteria
 
CategoryScoresCriteria
RetentionAlfaNo loss of restorative material
CharlieAny loss of restorative material
Color matchAlfaMatches tooth
BravoAcceptable mismatch
CharlieUnacceptable mismatch
Secondary cariesAlfaNo caries present
CharlieCaries present
Anatomic formAlfaContinuous
BravoSlight discontinuity, clinically acceptable
CharlieDiscontinuous, failure
Marginal adaptationAlfaClosely adapted, no detectable margin
BravoDetectable margin, clinically acceptable
CharlieMarginal crevice, clinical failure
Surface textureAlfaEnamel-like surface
BravoSurface rougher than enamel, clinically acceptable
CharlieSurface unacceptable rough