|
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Case Report |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
| Volume 4, Number 2, April 2012, pages 149-151 | |||||||
|
|
|||||||
|
Primary Tuberculous Abscess of the Spleen in an Immununocompetent
Patient Diagnosed by Biochemical Markers and Radiologic Findings
Hyung
Hun Kima,
b,
Seun Ja Parka,
Moo In Parka,
Won Moona
aDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
bCorresponding
author: Hyung Hun Kim, Department of Internal Medicine, Kosin
University College of Medicine, 34 Amnam-dong, Seo-gu, Busan
602-702, Korea. Email:
drhhkim@gmail.com Manuscript accepted for publication December 29, 2011 Short title: Primary Tuberculous Abscess doi:10.4021/jocmr800w
Abstract
Tuberculous splenic abscess in an immunocompetent
patient is extremely rare. We
came across a case of middle aged immunocompetent female who
presented with abdominal distension, weight loss, and low grade
fever. Abdominopelvic computed tomography showed multiple low
density lesions in the spleen with ascites. Interferon-gamma release
assay was positive and adenosine deaminase level of ascites was
significantly high. No primary focus of infection was detected. The
patient was diagnosed as having primary multiple tuberculous splenic
abscesses with tuberculous peritonitis causing ascites. Follow up
computed tomography, after completion of six month course of
anti-tubercular therapy, showed splenic abscess and ascites
completely disappeared.
Keywords:
Spleen; Abscess; Tuberculosis; Immunocompetent; Adenosine deaminase;
Interferon-gamma Introduction Splenic abscess is an uncommon disease and tuberculous splenic abscess is much rarer [1-3]. Although tuberculous splenic abscess is increasing in immunocompromised patients due to acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), tuberculous abscess in immunocompetent patients is still rare. Moreover, primary tuberculous splenic abscess in an immunocompetent patient is extremely rare. Up to now, only five cases have been reported [3-7]. All these cases were diagnosed histopathologically through splenic biopsy, exploratory laparotomy, and splenectomy [3-7]. In contrast, we experienced one such case diagnosed by abdominopelvic computed tomography and biochemical markers: adenosine deaminase and interferon-gamma release assay. Moreover, the patient completely recovered from tuberculous splenic abscess through anti-tuberculous therapy.
A
55-year-old female patient attended the gastroenterology clinic with
two-month history of gradually developed abdominal distention and
low-grade febrile sensation. Abdominal distension was associated
with dyspepsia and five kilogram-weight loss for last two months.
She had taken very small amount of food because she thought eating
food would aggravate abdominal distension. There was no past history
suggesting hepatitis and other chronic illness such as diabetes
mellitus. On physical examination, the patient had low-grade fever
(37.8
ºC)
with low body built and poor nutritional status despite of good
socioeconomic status. Abdominal examination revealed shifting
dullness and fluid wave. Her routine hematological and biochemical
investigations were within normal limits except low serum albumin
level (3.0 g/dL).
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
test for HIV was negative, and her CD4 count was 702/cu
mm. Markers for viral hepatitis were negative, and stool examination
did not reveal any parasite. Chest X ray was normal. A
contrast-enhanced abdominopelvic computed tomography (CT) scan
revealed splenomegaly which major axis was approximately 12.5 cm and
moderate amount of ascites. The spleen was occupied with multiple,
well-defined, low density, lesions measured 0.5 to 1.5 cm in size (Fig.
1).
There, however, was no significant intraabdominal lymphadenopathy.
Ascites was clear, and notable laboratory data of ascites were
followings: white blood cell count, 1,300/mm3
(lymphocyte, 90%); albumin, 2.5 g/dL
(serum ascites albumin gradient was 0.5 g/dL)
and adenosine deaminase (ADA), 76.9 IU/L
(normal: up to 45 IU/L). Her
serum adenosine deaminase level was 67.5 IU/L
(normal: up to 45 IU/L), so
ascitic fluid/serum ADA
ratio was 1.139. Interferon-gamma release assay (QuantiFERON®-TB
Gold, Cellestis Limited, Carnegie, Victoria, Australia) was proved
to be positive. Repeated cytologic examinations of ascites did not
find an abnormal cell. These findings strongly suggested tuberculous
peritonitis. Radiologic findings and biochemical tests made the
patient diagnosed as having multiple tuberculous splenic abscesses
with tuberculous peritonitis. We planned six-month course of oral
anti-tubercular regimen: Isoniazide: 300 mg, Rifampin 600 mg,
Pirazinamide 1.5 g, Ethambutol 1 g. After two-week of
anti-tubercular therapy, the patient’s ascites started to decrease
gradually, and she gained strength rapidly. Follow-up CT scan
performed one month after treatment showed the size of low density
nodules in the spleen markedly decreased, and the amount of ascites
was smaller than before (Fig.
2).
Six month-follow up CT scan showed low density nodules in the spleen
disappeared (Fig.
3),
and she recovered completely.
Tuberculous splenic abscess usually is confirmed by involvement of other organs. For this reason, invasive diagnostic modalities often need not to be involved in the workup of splenic lesions in tuberculous patients [8]. Contrary to tuberculous splenic abscesses involving other organs, all reported five cases with primary tuberculous splenic abscesses were diagnosed histopathologically via splenic biopsy, splenic abscess drainage, exploratory laparotomy, and splenectomy after treatment failure. However, we diagnosed primary splenic abscess by radiologic findings and biochemical markers: interferon-gamma assay and ADA. Non-invasive imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography and CT scan, play a role in the assessment of the extent of organ involvement, need for surgical intervention, and therapeutic response [8]. Contrast to these usual usages of image modalities, abdominopelvic CT scan played an imperative role for the diagnosis of splenic tuberculous abscess in our patient because our patient had only splenic lesions and refused percutaneous splenic biopsy. Typical CT findings are multiple, round or ovoid, low density lesions without calcification such as our case. In differential diagnosis of CT findings, lymphoma, hydatid disease, and metastases must be considered [6]. Adding to typical radiologic findings, Interferon-gamma release assay played an important role also. Interferon-gamma release assay is an in vitro laboratory diagnostic test using a whole blood specimen. It is an indirect test for M. tuberculosis complex (i.e., M. tuberculosis, M. bovis, M. africanum, M. microti, M.canetti) infection. The specificity of the test for the low-risk group was 98.1% and the sensitivity for patients with M. tuberculosis infection was 89.0% [9].Interferon-gamma release assay was positive in our patient. Another important biochemical marker was ADA in ascites and serum. Levels above 36 IU/L in ascitic fluid (sensitivity: 100%, specificity: 97.1%) and above 54 IU/L in the serum (sensitivity: 81.5%, specificity: 97.6%) suggest tuberculosis. The ascitic fluid/serum ADA ratio over 0.984 was suggestive of tuberculosis (sensitivity: 57.1%, specificity: 87.7%) [10]. Our patient’s ascitic fluid and serum ADA were 76.9 IU/L and 67.5 IU/L respectively. Moreover, ascitic fluid/serum ADA ratio was 1.139. These biochemical tests were quite helpful for us to have confidence that our patient had tuberculous splenic abscess and tuberculous peritonitis. Because our patient had not received any anti-tubercular therapy previously, we started six-month anti-tubercular therapy, which was effective in our patient. Her ascites started to decrease rapidly after two-week anti-tubercular therapy, and splenic tuberculous abscesses disappeared in three months.
Considering our case, physicians should bear it in
mind that primary tuberculous splenic abscess can be diagnosed by
typical radiologic findings and biochemical markers such as
interferon-gamma release assay and ADA, if there is ascites, without
splenic biopsy. Adding to this, starting anti-tubercular regimen
will be a reasonable choice for an immunocompetent patient without
previous tuberculosis, and the good response to medication will be
another indicator to confirm tuberculous splenic abscess. Conflict of Interest
The
authors report no conflicts of interest. The authors alone are
responsible for the content and writing of the paper. |
|||||||
|
|
|||||||
| References | |||||||
| 1. |
Lawhorne
TW, Jr., Zuidema GD. Splenic abscess. Surgery. 1976;79(6):686-689. [Medline] |
| 2. |
Altemeier
WA, Culbertson WR, Fullen WD, Shook CD. Intra-abdominal abscesses. Am J
Surg. 1973;125(1):70-79. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 3. |
Agarwala
S, Bhatnagar V, Mitra DK, Gupta AK, Berry M. Primary tubercular abscess
of the spleen. J Pediatr Surg. 1992;27(12):1580-1581. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 4. |
Neki NS,
Batra KS, Sharma RK, Sidhu BS, Multani LS, Sharma N. Isolated tubercular
splenic abscess. J Assoc Physicians India. 2001;49:759-760. [Medline] |
| 5. |
Sharma S,
Dey AB, Agarwal N, Nagarkar KM, Gujral S. Tuberculosis: a rare cause of
splenic abscess. J Assoc Physicians India. 1999;47(7):740-741. [Medline] |
| 6. |
Gotor MA,
Mur M, Guerrero L, Aspiroz C, Romero D, Gimeno E. [Tuberculous splenic
abscess in an immunocompetent patient]. Gastroenterol Hepatol.
1995;18(1):15-17. [Medline] |
| 7. |
Bastounis
E, Pikoulis E, Varelas P, Cirochristos D, Aessopos A. Tuberculoma of the
spleen: a rare but important clinical entity. Am Surg.
1999;65(2):131-132. [Medline] |
| 8. |
Sharma
SK, Smith-Rohrberg D, Tahir M, Mohan A, Seith A. Radiological
manifestations of splenic tuberculosis: a 23-patient case series from
India. Indian J Med Res. 2007;125(5):669-678. [Medline] |
| 9. |
Mori T,
Sakatani M, Yamagishi F, Takashima T, Kawabe Y, Nagao K, Shigeto E, et
al.
Specific detection of
tuberculosis infection: an interferon-gamma-based assay using new
antigens. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2004;170(1):59-64. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
| 10. |
Bhargava
DK, Gupta M, Nijhawan S, Dasarathy S, Kushwaha AK. Adenosine deaminase
(ADA) in peritoneal tuberculosis: diagnostic value in ascitic fluid and
serum.
Tubercle. 1990;71(2):121-126. [Medline] [CrossRef] |
Digital Object Identifier (DOI):10.4021/jocmr800w
About
DOI and
CrossRef
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is a member of CrossRef.




