J Clin Med Res
Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, ISSN 1918-3003 print, 1918-3011 online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Clin Med Res and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website http://www.jocmr.org

Case Report

Volume 4, Number 3, June 2012, pages 212-215


Use of Methylene Blue in the Treatment of Refractory Vasodilatory Shock After Cardiac Assist Device Implantation: Report of Four Consecutive Cases

Sebastian Michela, c, Florian Weisb, R Sodiana, Andres Beiras-Fernandeza, Amir K Bigdelia, Ingo Kaczmareka, Dirk Brueggerb

aDepartment of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
bDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany
cCorresponding author: Sebastian Michel, Department of Cardiac Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Marchioninistrasse 15, D-81377 Munich, Germany

Manuscript accepted for publication December 29, 2011
Short title: Use of Methylene Blue
doi: https://doi.org/10.4021/jocmr804w

Abstract▴Top 

Vasodilatory shock frequently occurs after cardiac surgery, particularly after cardiac assist device implantation. This complication is often associated with high mortality, especially if refractory to conventional vasoconstrictor treatment. Methylene blue, a guanylate cyclase inhibitor, has been successfully used in the management of vasodilatory shock associated with cardiopulmonary bypass. We present four successive cases after implantation of cardiac assist devices suffering from norepinephrine and vasopressin refractory severe vasodilatory shock. In all patients, administration of a single dose of methylene blue (2 mg/kg body weight) resulted in an immediate and persistent decrease in vasoconstrictor dosages and serum lactate concentrations. Despite of this benefit, all patients deceased during hospital stay, however, this was not related to the methylene blue treatment. Methylene blue seems to be a promising therapeutical option in patients with otherwise resistant vasodilatory shock after cardiac assist device implantation. However, controlled clinical trials are necessary to substantiate safety and efficacy.

Keywords: Methylene blue; Vasodilatory shock; Assist device

Introduction▴Top 

Vasodilatory shock is a frequent complication in the postoperative period in patients undergoing cardiac surgery which increases morbidity and mortality. It is characterized by peripheral vasodilatation, severe hypotension and by a poor response to therapy with vasoconstrictors. One important pathophysiological facet of this disease is an increased synthesis of nitric oxide [1, 2]. The use of the guanylate cyclase inhibitor methylene blue has been shown to be a successful therapeutical option in vasoplegic cardiac surgical patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery or valve replacement [3]. After implantation of cardiac assist devices, the incidence of vasodilatory shock has been described to be excessively high [4]. We report four successive patients after cardiac assist device implantation with catecholamine refractory vasoplegia, who were successfully treated with a single dose of methylene blue without any immediate serious side effects.

Case Report▴Top 

All patients received a single dose infusion of methylene blue (2 mg/kg body weight intravenously) over 30 minutes.

Case 1

A 49-year-old male patient (188 cm, 98 kg) suffered from decompensated dilative cardiomyopathy. As he did not respond to conventional treatment (inotropes and insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump) a Jarvik 2000 left ventricular assist device (Jarvik Heart Inc., NYC, NY, USA) was implanted. Postoperatively, the patient developed right heart failure, necessitating the implantation of an additional temporary right ventricular assist device (Levitronix, Levitronix GmbH, Zurich, Switzerland). Severe postoperative bleeding required rethoracotomy and mass transfusion. Despite no further bleeding and faultless function of both cardiac assist devices, the patient developed a severe vasoplegic shock, requiring very high dosages of norepinephrine (4.0 mg/h) and vasopressin (6.0 I.U./h). After administration of a single dose methylene blue both norepinephrine and vasopressin dosages rapidly decreased and serum lactate concentrations normalized (Fig. 1). On the fourth postoperative day the patient developed pneumonia caused by pseudomonas aeruginosa with severe impairment of pulmonary function. An oxygenator was connected to the right ventricular assist device to enable sufficient oxygenation. Despite inhalative application of milrinone and iloprost, right ventricular function did not recover sufficiently. Although the patient was treated with antibiotics (piperacillin/tazobactam, ciprofloxacin, vancomycin) markers of infection did not decrease and the patient died ten days after methylene blue administration from multi-organ failure.

Figure 1.
Click for large image
Figure 1. Individual and median values of mean arterial blood pressure (panel A), norepinephrine dosage (panel B), vasopressin dosage (panel C), and serum lactate concentration (panel D) before (B) and 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 12, and 24 hours after a single dose administration of methylene blue (2 mg/kg body weight).

Case 2

A 46-year-old male patient (185 cm, 80 kg) with a history of myocardial infarction and limited cardiac function (LVEF 20%) underwent resection of a massive left ventricular anterior wall aneurysm combined with mitral valve annuloplasty. Despite adequate filling pressures, use of multiple inotropic agents including levosimendan and insertion of an intraaortic balloon pump, cardiogenic shock occured postoperatively. He was transferred to the operating room for venoarterial extracorporal membrane oxygenation (ECMO, Medtronic, Biomedicus, MI, USA) rescue therapy. Since weaning from ECMO remained unsuccessful for four days, a permanent left ventricular assist device (Jarvik 2000) was inserted. Postoperatively, the patient suffered from right heart failure resistant to inhalation of iloprost and milrinone, so that venoarterial ECMO had to be re-implanted. Despite good function of both cardiac assist devices the patient suffered from severe vasodilatory shock resistant to high dosages of norepinephrine (3.0 mg/h) and vasopressin (8.0 I.U./h). Administration of methylene blue resulted in a reduction of norepinephrine and vasopressin to acceptable dosages within four hours (Fig. 1). However, no therapeutic option was suitable for this patient: switching to a synchronized biventricular assist device was technically not possible any more. The patient died 18 hours after methylene blue administration.

Case 3

In a 32-year-old male patient (187 cm, 114 kg) with decompensated dilative cardiomyopathy a biventricular assist device (Berlin Heart Excor, Berlin Heart GmbH, Berlin, Germany) was implanted, as a bridge to transplant. Postoperatively, severe septic shock caused by pneumonia occurred and was treated empirically with meropenem, moxifloxacin, and linezolid. Despite adequate filling pressures, 7.0 mg/h of norepinephrine and 7.0 I.U./h of vasopressin were necessary to stabilize circulatory conditions. Methylene blue was applicated and vasoconstrictor dosages could be reduced within hours (Fig. 1). On the fourth postoperative day the patient suddenly developed pulmonary edema. Despite therapeutical heparinization and aspirin therapy echocardiography revealed a thrombus, most probably derived from the left atrial appendage, nearly completely occluding the left ventricular inflow cannula. In an immediate re-operation the left ventricular inflow cannula was replaced from the left ventricular apex to the left atrium. During surgery, the left atrium ruptured. Surgical repair was unfeasible, so that the patient died intraoperatively from severe hemorrhage.

Case 4

A 70-year-old male patient (155 cm, 64 kg) with pre-existing coronary heart disease underwent coronary angiography with instable angina pectoris. A significant stenosis of the right coronary artery was detected. The attempt to insert the wire into the right coronary artery resulted in a complete dissection of the vessel. Emergency coronary artery bypass operation with a saphenous vein graft was performed immediately, but revascularisation was technically impossible. Accordingly, the patient developed right heart failure and received venoarterial ECMO. Postoperatively, norepinephrine (1.6 mg/h) and vasopressin (8.0 I.U. /h) resistant vasodilatory shock occurred. After a single dose of methylene blue vasoconstrictor dosages decreased within hours (Fig. 1). Despite maximum pharmacological support including inhalation of iloprost and milrinone right ventricular performance could not be improved during the following seven days. As the patient was considered to be too old for implantation of a definitive right ventricular assist device, therapeutic measures were terminated. The patient died 8 days after methylene blue administration.

Discussion▴Top 

The present case series shows that intravenous single dose administration of methylene blue in patients with vasodilatory shock after cardiac assist device implantation resulted in improved hemodynamics. An immediate and persistent decrease of vasopressor (norepinephrine and vasopressin) dosages was observed in all patients. Moreover, the lower lactate levels after infusion suggest that methylene blue increased the vascular tone without compromising global tissue perfusion (Fig.1).

One underlying mechanism of vasodilatory shock involves increased nitric oxide production. The release of nitric oxide leads to activation of the enzyme guanylate cyclase, which increases the synthesis of cGMP, a mediator of vascular smooth muscle relaxation [1]. Methylene blue inhibits guanylate cyclase, thus, mitigating the vasorelaxant effect of nitric oxide in the smooth muscle cells of the vessels [2, 5].

At the time point of methylene blue administration all patients were severely ill with multiple organ failure and high Apache II scores ranging between 32 and 40 with a predicted mortality between 76% and 91% [6]. Despite the beneficial effects on hemodynamics and serum lactate concentrations all patients died during hospital stay. However, this was not related to methylene blue administration. At a dosage of 2 mg/kg body weight no serious side effects were observed. The only adverse effects were discolouration of the urine (greenish-blue) in all four patients and shivering in one patient (patient 2).

We conclude that methylene blue, through its effect on the nitric oxide pathway, is a promising option in the treatment of patients with vasodilatory shock after cardiac assist device implantation. However, a controlled clinical trial is needed to evaluate the benefit and best time point of application of methylene blue in severely ill patients before routine use can be recommended.


References▴Top 
  1. Landry DW, Oliver JA. The pathogenesis of vasodilatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(8):588-595.
    pubmed
  2. Faber P, Ronald A, Millar BW. Methylthioninium chloride: pharmacology and clinical applications with special emphasis on nitric oxide mediated vasodilatory shock during cardiopulmonary bypass. Anaesthesia. 2005;60(6):575-587.
    pubmed
  3. Levin RL, Degrange MA, Bruno GF, Del Mazo, Taborda DJ, Griotti JJ, Boullon FJ. Methylene blue reduces mortality and morbidity in vasoplegic patients after cardiac surgery. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004;77(2):496-499.
    pubmed
  4. Argenziano M, Chen JM, Choudhri AF, Cullinane S, Garfein E, Weinberg AD, Smith CR, Jr, et al. Management of vasodilatory shock after cardiac surgery: identification of predisposing factors and use of a novel pressor agent. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1998;116(6):973-980.
    pubmed
  5. Mayer B, Brunner F, Schmidt K. Inhibition of nitric oxide synthesis by methylene blue. Biochem Pharmacol. 1993;45(2):367-374.
    pubmed
  6. Knaus WA, Draper EA, Wagner DP, Zimmerman JE. APACHE II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med. 1985;13(10):818-829.
    pubmed


This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Clinical Medicine Research is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research, monthly, ISSN 1918-3003 (print), 1918-3011 (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jocmr.org   editorial contact: editor@jocmr.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.


Disclaimer: The views and opinions expressed in the published articles are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views or opinions of the editors and Elmer Press Inc. This website is provided for medical research and informational purposes only and does not constitute any medical advice or professional services. The information provided in this journal should not be used for diagnosis and treatment, those seeking medical advice should always consult with a licensed physician.